The
Robinson-Patman Act
(An
amendment to the Clayton Act, U.S.C.,
title 15, sec. 13. as amended)
The following
is an excerpt from the Robinson Patman Act that applies
to cooperative advertising and other promotional allowance
payments. For a complete copy of the Act contact the Federal
Trade Commission.
Sec.
2. DISCRIMINATION IN PRICE, SERVICES,
OR FACILITIES
Sec. 2. (a) That
it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce,
in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly,
to discriminate in price between different purchasers of
commodities of like grade and quality,where either or any
of the purchases involved in such discrimination are in
commerce, where such commodities are sold for use, consumption,
or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof
or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or
other place under the jurisdiction of the United States,and
where the effect of such discrimination may be substantially
to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any
line of commerce, or to injure,destroy, or prevent competition
with any person who either grants or knowingly receives
the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of
either of them: Provided.That nothing herein
contained shall prevent differentials which make only due
allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale,
or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities
in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold or
delivered:Provided, however. That the Federal
Trade Commission may, after due investigation and hearing
to all interested parties, fix and establish quantity limits,
and revise the same as it finds necessary, as to particular
commodities or classes of commodities, where it finds that
available purchasers in greater quantities are so few as
to render differentials on account thereof unjustly discriminatory
or promotive of monopoly in any line of commerce; and the
foregoing shall then not be construed to permit differentials
based on differences in quantities greater than those so
fixed and established: And provided further.That
nothing herein contained shall prevent persons engaged in
selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting
their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in
restraint of trade: And provided further.That
nothing herein contained shall prevent price changes from
time to time where in response to changing conditions affecting
the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned,
such as but not limited to actual or imminent deterioration
of perishable goods, obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress
sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance
of business in the goods concerned.
(b)
Upon proof being made, at any hearing
on a complaint under this section,
that there has been discrimination
in price or services or facilities
furnished, the burden of rebutting
the prima facie case thus made by
showing justification shall be upon
the person charged with a violation
of this section, and unless justification
shall be affirmatively shown, the
Commission is authorized to issue
an order terminating the discrimination:
Provided, however.
That nothing herein contained shall
prevent a seller rebutting the prima
facie case thus made by showing that
his lower price or the furnishing
of services or facilities to any purchaser
or purchasers was made in good faith
to meet an equally low price of a
competitor, or the services or facilities
furnished by a competitor.
(c)
That it shall be unlawful for any
person engaged in commerce, in the
course of such commerce, to pay or
grant, or to receive or accept, anything
of value as a commission, brokerage,
or other compensation, or any allowance
or discount in lieu thereof, except
for services rendered in connection
with the sale or purchase of goods,
wares, or merchandise, either to the
other party to such transaction or
to an agent, representative, or other
intermediary therein where such intermediary
is acting in fact for or in behalf,
or is subject to the direct or indirect
control, of any party to such transaction
other than the person by whom such
compensation is so granted or paid.
(d)
That it shall be unlawful for any
person engaged in commerce to pay
or contract for the payment of anything
of value to or for the benefit of
a customer of such person in the course
of such commerce as compensation or
in consideration for any services
or facilities furnished by or through
such customer in connection with the
processing, handling, sale, or offering
for sale of any products or commodities
manufactured, sold, or offered for
sale by such person, unless such payment
or consideration is available on proportionally
equal terms, to all other customers
competing in the distribution of such
products or commodities.
(e)
That it shall be unlawful for any
person to discriminate in favor of
one purchaser against another purchaser
or purchasers of a commodity bought
for resale, with or without processing,
by contracting to furnish or furnishing,
or by contributing to the furnishing
of, any services or facilities connected
with the processing, handling, sale,
or offering for sale of such commodity
so purchased upon terms not accorded
to all purchasers on proportionally
equal terms.
(f)
That it shall be unlawful for any
person engaged in commerce, in the
course of such commerce, knowingly
to induce or receive a discrimination
in price which is prohibited by this
section.
Federal
Trade Commission Act (U.S.C., Title 15, sec. 45 (a)(1)
Sec.
5. (a) (1) Unfair methods of competition
in commerce, and unfair or deceptive
acts or practices in commerce, are
hereby declared unlawful.
Federal
Register / Vol. 55, No 160 / Friday,
August 17, 1990 /Rules and Regulations
Back
to Antitrust Issues Menu
Created
February 27, 2004